Pilot and engagement path

Start with one site and one decision.

The Power Claim Stress Test is the initial engagement using Headroom evidence software. Begin by email with the question and available record categories; share authorized records only after the scope is agreed.

Propose a real-site pilot See a Sample Decision

First real-site pilot

One site. One decision. Authorized records.

Headroom is seeking its first company-authorized, real-site data pilot. The Power Claim Stress Test is the initial engagement using Headroom evidence software, not a claim of an existing customer deployment.

Describe the site, the question you need answered, the evaluation period, and the record categories available, such as meter exports, charging schedules, reserve rules, or fuel-consumption records. Categories are enough for the first inquiry.

Data handling and scope are agreed before records are shared. Do not send sensitive records through the contact form or email; any authorized records are exchanged later through an agreed channel.

The screen may find support, limits, missing evidence, or an unknown result. A favorable capacity finding is not promised. Real company data formats and mapping effort have not yet been tested; no fixed price or turnaround is published.

Propose a real-site pilot

Define the first screen

A bounded question, a reviewable result.

Scope, fees, and timing are agreed before work begins. An unsupported claim or a need for better data is a legitimate outcome; a favorable capacity finding is not promised.

What we agree before starting

One site and one defined power claim or proposed use.
The decision you need to make.
An evaluation period and exported-data scope.
Relevant protected obligations and buyer-supplied assumptions.
The intended reviewer and supporting materials to be returned.

What you receive

A screening report explaining the capacity finding and its limitations.
Principal constraints, protected obligations, and missing-data findings.
Recommended next checks before further commitment.
Supporting assumptions, evidence-file references, and technical verification materials within the agreed scope.

Progress when justified

Let the evidence determine the next step.

Single-site screen

Test the defined claim using the agreed exports. Establish what the records support and what remains unknown.

Deeper evidence pilot

Where justified, evaluate additional authorized records and supporting replay materials against a more detailed question.

Evaluate repeated use

Consider recurring reviews or partner embedding after the workflow has been validated for the intended use. These are prospective arrangements.

A parallel option

More than one candidate site?

A Portfolio Power Screen compares several locations using an agreed scope and common decision vocabulary. It is an option for multi-site buyers, not a required step before an evidence pilot.

Discuss a portfolio screen

Start the discussion in writing

Describe the decision and available record categories. We can clarify fit and scope by email; a phone call is optional. Authorized records are shared later through an agreed channel.

Discuss a partner evaluation