Client name redacted
Records reviewed: bills, meter data, fuel logs
Top limiting obligation: peak customer period
Possible next path: overnight review
Sample decision
Preliminary Capacity View
A public-safe excerpt showing how Headroom presents the decision. This is an illustrative sample, not a customer report.
Public-safe sampleClient name redactedRead-only reviewNo control credentials
Recommendation
Request targeted data before advancing the proposed load.
The available records show possible low-conflict windows, but confidence is not strong enough to support capital movement without updated interval data and obligation schedules.
42Records reviewed
2Likely windows
3Protected obligations
1Next path
| Review area | Finding | Business decision supported |
|---|---|---|
| Site load | Evening load drops below daily operating peak. | Worth deeper review, not ready for commitment. |
| Protected reserve | Fleet and reserve commitments take priority in morning and peak periods. | Do not schedule flexible load in protected windows. |
| Usable window | Two candidate windows appear plausible after confidence adjustment. | Request updated interval records before engineering. |
Client name redacted
Records reviewed: charger logs, fleet schedule
Top limiting obligation: morning readiness
Possible next path: request duty cycle
Client name redacted
Records reviewed: interconnection notes, interval data
Top limiting obligation: reserve margin
Possible next path: compare portfolio
Client name redacted
Records reviewed: generation, storage, runtime records
Top limiting obligation: resilience runtime
Possible next path: preserve-first review