Which sites deserve engineering?
Rank by evidence-supported usable windows, protected obligations, and missing data.
For modular compute and powered-site developers
Screen powered-site portfolios before the engineering queue fills.
Developers need to know which candidate sites deserve diligence, partner attention, and capital. Headroom turns exported records into a comparable first screen without controlling equipment or claiming utility approval.
Why it fits
A portfolio can look rich in power and still hide weak first candidates.
Small modular data-center and power-partner models move faster when development teams can rank sites consistently before full engineering.
Portfolio Power Screen
Candidate set: client redacted
- Records reviewed
- Interconnection notes, meter exports, fuel or generation records
- Top limiting obligation
- Protected reserve and incomplete interval evidence
- Possible next path
- Advance two sites, request data on three, stop one
Which counterparty conversations need facts?
Show what records support the next question without overstating readiness.
Which sites should wait?
Avoid moving weak or incomplete sites into expensive diligence too early.